I, personally, believe in understand what I am voting onI knew exactly what I was voting on. When skimmed, your article supported (until the phrase was bolded) softreferences. Those are bad. I completely understood what I was doing, and support it now as well. The fact that you altered your article after the fact is actually evidence to my claim.
I was not attempting to slander you, so I'm confused about the legal charges comment you made.I wasn't talking about slander. I was talking about copyright. It's a copyright violation to take private mail and rebroadcast it without permission. I believe I was clear earlier when I said "(b) a copyright violation". What part of that did you miss?
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
In reply to Re^4: $var$cnt problems
by merlyn
in thread $var$cnt problems
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |