Class::Tangram has been designed with OO considerations like this in mind.
I know practically nothing about Class::Tangram, but I have to say this: it's got to be the most ineptly named module in all of CPAN. The fact that anyone uses it at all, given its name, is a marvel, and an exceptionally effective endorsement. To paraphrase the Smucker's slogan: with a name like Tangram, it has to be good.
the lowliest monk
In reply to Re^2: Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?
by tlm
in thread Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?
by tphyahoo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |