You are right that state serialization only works when the state is entirely referenced through that blessed value. You could even say that it's breaking package encapsulation.package XX; sub new { bless([1,2,3],__PACKAGE__) } package YY; sub new { $abc="abc"; bless(\$abc,__PACKAGE__) } package ZZ; sub new { $ott=123; bless(\$ott,__PACKAGE__) } package main; use Data::Dumper; print +(Dumper(new XX)); print +(Dumper(new YY)); print +(Dumper(new ZZ)); __OUTPUT__ $VAR1 = bless( [ 1, 2, 3 ], 'XX' ); $VAR1 = bless( do{\(my $o = 'abc')}, 'YY' ); $VAR1 = bless( do{\(my $o = 123)}, 'ZZ' );
But state serialization is, as the name implies, writing the state of the object, not the state of the package which manages the object. If you want to implement a new object model on top of the one Perl has got already, including flyweight or inside-out, then your new object model will have to be responsible for any serialization tasks. Unfortunately, that means that packages with non-native object models must document that they need special handling for serialization.
--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]
In reply to Re^3: Can I serialize an object and have it remember it's type?
by halley
in thread Can I serialize an object and have it remember it's type?
by tphyahoo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |