One of my first perl modules ever was an attempt at a family of binary search tree modules. The few programming classes I took taught a lot about trees and they seemed really neat, especially splay trees which could self-optimize.
I discovered this: The performance stinks. Unless you're dealing with a bazillion records, just use a hash. Even having to sort a hash each time the performance will blow a tree written in Perl out of the water. One of those cases where C is significant in calculating algorithm efficiency.
In reply to You probably want a hash.
by schwern
in thread help! red-black binary tree problem
by frustrated_intern
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |