I haven't seen any documentation outside of reading gv.c. Ovid is the one who gave me the tip. My guess is that someone fooled around with Devel::Peek and found that anonymous globs have a special case to give them stash names.
In reply to Re^3: How to fool caller() / use NEXT within a dynamic sub
by chromatic
in thread How to fool caller() / use NEXT within a dynamic sub
by betterworld
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |