It looks like a closure to me. Based on some really wierd combination of the require and the my variable. Since perl doesn't see that func2 uses the "global" lexical $sep, the variable is not bound to func2. So you end up with a different $sep from the lexical that you think you're seeing.
That said, I get funny results when I change testcall2.pl:
This shows the address to be the same - although I'm not sure I'm doing that right. However, I think my theory is right based on the fact that if I change "my" to "our", so we're using global variables and not lexicals (thus no more closure), then things work the way we think it should.#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my ($sep, $z); sub func2 { #print "func2: \$sep == $sep\n"; eval '$z = sub { print "sep == ($sep)\n"; printf "sep => %p\n", \$ +sep}'; &{$z}(); } sub func1 { $sep = "AB"; printf "sep => %p\n", \$sep; func2(); } 1;
In reply to Re: A 'print' at one spot changes a value at another
by Tanktalus
in thread A 'print' at one spot changes a value at another
by ralphmerridew
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |