Catalyst is much more advanced down the development path than Maypole, but personally, I prefer CGI::Appplication because it's easier to learn, but the sheer volume of plugins being added in the last few months gives you a level of functionality on a par with Catalyst.
Catalyst has a steep learning curve IMHO, which is not helped by the documentation which seems a bit unstructured to me, but which obviously is sufficient for all those Catalyst programmers out there ... so I guess that it's personal taste.
A comparison between CGI::Application and Catalyst can be found here
In reply to Re: Maypole or PageKit?
by astroboy
in thread Maypole or PageKit?
by ait
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |