Interesting...
I had to write a term paper on an "advanced Java server technology" for a Java programming course. I chose to look at Object-Relational Mapping, and focused on something called SimpleORM.
Some ORMs try to make persistent objects indistinguishable from non-persistent objects, while others force you to directly acknowledge the difference in the code. SimpleORM did the latter (although you could then put a wrapper/facade around DAOs to hide that down the line. Now, one reason I liked SimpleORM was that it doesn't use XML anywhere, and doesn't try to hide the fact that some classes are different because they have a backing store for persistence.
In reply to Re^2: A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers
by herveus
in thread A Growing Dislike for SQL-OOP Mappers
by jk2addict
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |