My guess would be that people have a pretty good idea about what's plagiarism and what's not. As some monks pointed out, there can be a fairly long period between the time a question is first read, and when the answer gets posted. It's not always plagiarism if the answers are similar.
I use down-votes sparingly, for the most egregious "sins" (such as not bothering to try to figure it out before posting a question). Only a word-for-word repeat of a post would convince me of plagiarism, because many coding issues do have a single optimum solution.
In reply to Re: In support of downvoting plagiarism
by spiritway
in thread In support of downvoting plagiarism
by anonymized user 468275
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |