Of course! I was only thinking of use strict 'vars'. This is one morning where I should have stayed in bed.
In any case, I'd rather find this error definitely, rather than have the program fail in wierd and unpredicatable ways. It's a question of whether you want to create no data (by dying from strict) or create bad data (by referencing variables that don't exist). I'd vote for no data over bad data any day of the week.
In reply to Re^3: turn off strict for production code
by ikegami
in thread turn off strict for production code
by blahblahblah
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |