About the only place you'd need the ampersand version is if you're trying to get the current scope's @_ passed a la &somesub;. But that's really rare.
In reply to Re^4: Dereferencing code refs with & vs. ->()
by ikegami
in thread Dereferencing code refs with & vs. ->()
by doran
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |