However the OP was bout dereferencing and given that context it is about the only place you have to use an ampersand. Taking a reference to a named sub has nothing to do with using & versus -> in dereferencing and calling a coderef. The point about goto &$coderef is correct (and that would be one of the exceptions that I was alluding to by qualifying with about), but as the AM points out prototype checking doesn't apply to coderefs so that "counterexample" is also not really relevant. Given the original context the statement is not "completely false".

In reply to Re^5: Dereferencing code refs with & vs. ->() by Fletch
in thread Dereferencing code refs with & vs. ->() by doran

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.