Your handling of mail received at an expired ("rotated") address looks to be a sticking point, to me. If Segmail sees an invalid password, "it marks it as junk (bounces it, deletes it, challenge/responses it, moves it to a different folder, whatever)". If a legitimate message is bounced or challenged, the sender might decide instead to abandon the contact -- this is one of challenge/response's sticking points. Legitimate message deletion is a big sticking point with unintelligent filters.
You say that "No legitimate mail will ever get filtered", but what happens if a correspondent doesn't have your most recent address? "it marks it as junk (bounces it, deletes it, challenge/responses it, moves it to a different folder, whatever)". In any except the quarantine response, the legitimate mail will be filtered, perhaps into the bit bucket.
Live like you want to live. I was merely suggesting that you consider alternatives that already exist and have been proven in the real world by thousands or tens of thousands of users.
In reply to Re^3: RFC: Email 2.0: Segmail
by gloryhack
in thread RFC: Email 2.0: Segmail
by tomazos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |