*Why* would it be good to have the package statement warn if the symbol table for that package already exists?
Just for grins, I have discerned that the package statement, by itself, appears to cause $::{<package>::} to spring into existence, so that is what you'd be looking for...but I don't see any general value in attempting to make repeated use of 'package X' warnable. In fact, switching the default namespace on the fly is a perfectly valid technique.
In reply to Re: Namespaces contiguous in the entirety
by herveus
in thread Namespaces contiguous in the entirety
by rir
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |