I think that with test driven design it is possible to write code to pass tests rather than code that fulfils the intended purpose. The presence of a safety net may make you a little careless on the high-wire.
Yeah, I see that sometimes. It often comes from people thinking they're finished when all the tests pass, rather than when they can't write a failing test.
In reply to Re^2: A danger of test driven development.
by adrianh
in thread A danger of test driven development.
by Perl Mouse
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |