The tests are supposed to be a translation-into-code of the specification. TDD is therefore supposed to be S(pec)DD. Obviously, that doesn't always happen.
What TDD does is shift the quality assurance constraint. Instead of looking at the program, you look at the tests. Bad things happen if you think that quality assurance is no longer an issue. It's every bit as important as it is in any other paradigm; it's just supposed to be easier to verify.
In reply to Re^2: A danger of test driven development.
by Roy Johnson
in thread A danger of test driven development.
by Perl Mouse
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |