Ah. Well, I hate the idea of showcasing lower rep nodes on the Best Nodes list just because some of the best nodes are clustered together. Might as well call it the "Next Best Nodes" list. The ten best threads (so long as the meaning of "best" was satisfactory) would be far more interesting to me. It would probably be more interesting to me than Best Nodes if it were implemented well.
-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
In reply to Re^3: Better Best Nodes?
by sauoq
in thread Better Best Nodes?
by Roy Johnson
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |