I am also occasionally guilty of throwing my hands up when I become frustrated with someone asking for help when they just don't get it. I unrealistically expect others to learn as quickly and as easily as I do.

I, too, have had that kind of experience. Unlike you, I actually matriculated college, and was still one of the bigger fish. (It was a little college.) I'm wondering if you and I actually learn as quickly and as easily as we think we do. Or, is it that we have chosen not to continuously challenge ourselves?

I say this because of two things:

  1. Because I now work with stvn, I've been drawn into the P6 metamodel discussions. There's a lot of really really smart people on the P6L list. These guys are so smart it's scary. Yet, I can't help thinking that the smartest ones on the list are the ones who refuse to be locked into an idea, subject everything to a sniff test, and are insatiable learners. Their brilliance, if anything, is in finding relationships between unconnected pieces of knowledge. (Read up on how Larry built Perl 1.0 to see what I'm talking about. Plus, why hasn't Larry ever given a State of the Onion that was actually on programming?)
  2. My wife and her parents don't have college degrees. Yet, these are the things they are able to do that I can't, even though they're just engineering or optimization problems:
    • My wife can feed and clothe a family of 7 (including an infant and a toddler) on $200/week. (optimization)
    • My father-in-law can build cars. (engineering)
    • My mother-in-law taught herself how to program and use databases (through CrystalReports) while being a secretary.

As I approach 30 in a few weeks, I'm starting to realize that what you know, while important, is less important than either what you do with it or what you did to get that knowledge. It also doesn't hurt to have a good respect for the other guy. (Read Martin Buber's I and Thou for a good grasp of the difference between a personalized Other and an objectified Other. Then, cross-reference that with http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/monkeysphere.html.)

My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

In reply to Re: Coming Down From The Pedestal by dragonchild
in thread Coming Down From The Pedestal by Limbic~Region

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.