That's called "indirect object syntax" ... read all about it here http://blog.simon-cozens.org/blosxom.cgi/2003/Apr/22#6416
reference: Re^3: use CGI qw(:standard) vs. use CGI
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
In reply to Re: Foo->new() vs. new Foo()
by jeffa
in thread Foo->new() vs. new Foo()
by nmerriweather
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |