"In legacy code, the interface may be the implementation, but that does not mean that one is necessarily white-box testing."

It is interesting that "white-box testing" suddenly showed up.

I think there is a mix up. The way you test something has absolutely nothing to do with how it is spec'd out, or how it is implemented. The tester has a choice.

As for white box and black box. Let's use maze as an example to explain this. If you draw your maze on a piece of paper, when I look at that piece of paper, I see a white box. If I am going through a real hay maze, I am seeing a black box.

In reply to Re: (OT) Black- vs. white-box testing by pg
in thread (OT) Black- vs. white-box testing by dragonchild

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.