I'm not sure weighting comes into play
That's the direction I'd head, I think. Each field contributes to the likelihood of a match, but probably not equally. If they are equal then you can just add them, right?
One way to solve this is with a neural network. You'll need a training set of known records with known-good result values. If your training data is good then your network should be able to assign optimal weights to the various inputs. If you don't have a source of good, diverse training data then don't bother going down this path.
-sam
In reply to Re: Metric for confidence of complex match
by samtregar
in thread Metric for confidence of complex match
by japhy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |