...but (oops: opening self to charges of pouring gasoline on fire)... some authors, properly IMO, publish work-in-progress to obtain feedback. I can't fault using sub 1.0 version numbers on those known (or believed) to be IMperfect or INcomplete.
But (reverting to agreeability_mode) yeah; numbering a release with a sub 1.0 version number if it passes testing and is ready to do (something | anything ) useful seems to me to be inappropriate, and likely founded on "going along with current style" or "low self-esteem."
so, ++; RANT ON!!, dwildesnl.In reply to Re: A Peeve of Great Pettishness
by ww
in thread A Peeve of Great Pettishness
by samizdat
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |