I haven't used cgi.pm in a long time, and I don't even remember using syntax like that (and come to think of it, the syntax as shown doesn't even make much sense in nesting terms, I think there's some typos in there), but I would have to guess that this sort of structural change would do it:
$cgi->Tr({ -align=>LEFT, -valign=>TOP}, [ td( { }, [ $cgi->a( {-href=>"..", -target=>"_new"} ) . $cgi->img(..) ] ), td( { -OnClick=>"javascript:dothis()" }, [ $cgi->a( {..}, $value1 ), $cgi->hidden( -name=>'name2', -value=>'$value2' ). $cgi->a( $value2), $cgi->hidden( -name=>'name3', -value=>'$value3' ). $cgi->a( $value2) ]), ]);
Basically, split that td clause into two seperate ones, one without the javascript attribute containing the first td, and one with it containing the other three.
In reply to Re: Creating a table using cgi.pm - a unique problem
by ph713
in thread Creating a table using cgi.pm - a unique problem
by sara2005
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |