There is no need to be so melodramatic when mentioning the issue.
This site has many newbies. It is only fair to warn them: even if the OP probably knows it, then there are still many lurkers who may not. They can find out details themselves, so I don't feel a need to further describe when and how it is dangerous.
How do you know what he thinks? Absolutism and assumptions, all of this.
Apparently not your style. It is mine, though. Please stfu and let me express myself the way I prefer.
The absolutism and assumptions are obvious and not to be taken too literally.
Who asked?
For the record, would you please specify who asked for your whining?
If all information were in Q&A form, life would seem even more complex than it actually is.
More like Perl 6 spam...
I'm glad to see you get the point! Good!
Would you please curb your enthusiasm and answer those questions only after someone asks them?
No way.
Or perhaps just write a series of meditations;
"Or"?
And. I've done one already, and had another planned (mostly written, see scratchpad), but I'm holding it off while I further investigate whether what I have written is actually correct. There will probably be more. Together, you might call this a series.
Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
In reply to Re^3: s/// in a sub : passing expressions
by Juerd
in thread s/// in a sub : passing expressions
by ady
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |