I also think I like Net::TCPServer::Linux best. Regarding the documentation, I hesitate to say it (because it's great to see someone take the time to actually provide extensive documentation), but it's a bit much ;-). A lot of the information given in the .pod is on the internals of the modules, design decisions and general networking background. IMO the module documentation should be there foremost to describe the user interface, things that are important to the user of the module. I'm not saying that any of the information you give is useless, but perhaps some of it could be broken out into a separate document (or separate sections in the docs). As it is, valuable user information is mixed together with design decisions and it's a lot to read for someone who is not familiar with the module. YMMV.
The example in the pod also seems a bit long and would IMO be better in a separate script in an example/ subdirectory. Examples in the pod should be general-purpose and preferably only show how the module itself works (and not include external database connections and the like). Again, YMMV, and I'll be interested to read what others think of this.
In reply to Re: RFC - Linux::TCPServer (new module)
by tirwhan
in thread RFC - Linux::TCPServer (new module)
by ph713
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |