I’ve stayed out of sauoq’s thread for the most part, because while I agree with his sentiment, I rather disagree about the premises. However, I wanted to offer my own reasoning for arriving at the same conclusion, different though the way of getting there might be.
Let me first state The Law of Bad Titles:
People write really bad titles.
The key is that by thinking about this, we can derive The Corollary of The Law of Bad Titles:
Those who rewrite titles are no better at it.
And that is why, at the bottom line, I agree with sauoq.
Further to the point, many retitling considerations seem to come about because someone decides the node needs retitling, then tries to think of a better title. I get the impression that people want to leave footsteps in wet cement.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments by Aristotle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |