Could you switch to constraint_methods for the billing fields? I haven't done this, so I'm not going to give an example. But look in the perldoc for Data::FormValidator in the section called VALIDATING INPUT BASED ON MULTIPLE FIELDS. It refers to the perldoc for Data::FormValidator::Constraints and its section WRITING YOUR OWN VALIDATION ROUTINES.

I think those sections and a bit of play will work.

Essentially, you write your own validation routines for your billing address fields. Each of those routines can resceive the value of the checkbox as a parameter.

Phil

In reply to Re: Data::FormValidator inverse dependencies? by philcrow
in thread Data::FormValidator inverse dependencies? by meraxes

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.