Where I work security is a huge issue. What I've resolved must be done before CPAN modules can be used in this enviornment is to create an internal CPAN. Which will allow for several things:
I'm not paranoid about CPAN, but I view it as an I.V. from which a large organization must design it's own needle. What you say about code review is very true, and no matter how important security is, the type of code review you speak of is impractical. But like Perl, it's capriciousness cannot be left completely unchecked except at ones own level of acceptable risk.
coreolynIn reply to Re: Paranoia, NIH, and Beyond
by coreolyn
in thread A Fit on NIH
by footpad
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |