Yeah, I read that part in A12 as well, I think it is flat out insanity myself :) Nuff said.I'd just like to point out that the passage you're quoting has almost nothing to do with standard dispatch. It's just syntactic relief for alternate dispatchers, selected by the caller. That last bit is important. Once you commit to a particular dispatcher, you're stuck with it. If you use the ordinary dispatcher syntax, you get the ordinary dispatcher. There's no extra overhead there. In fact, you probably use the ordinary fast dispatcher to get to the alternate dispatcher, as if it were just an ordinary method call. The rest is just syntax.
In reply to Re^7: Informal Poll: Traits (Long Post Warning!)
by TimToady
in thread Informal Poll: why aren't you using traits?
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |