But he still can't just assume that the slope is 1. Let's take a concrete example and run a sanity check to demonstrate that.
and I'm not going to bother working out what he thinks that y should be since his value for x is already obviously wrong.peak (1/2, 1/2), height 5, slope 2 point 1: bottom left 5 - 2*sqrt((3/2)**2 + (3/2)**2) = 0.757359312880715 point 2: bottom right 5 - 2*sqrt((1/2)**2 + (3/2)**2) = 1.83772233983162 point 3: top right 5 - 2*sqrt((1/2)**2 + (1/2)**2) = 3.58578643762691 point 4: top left 5 - 2*sqrt((3/2)**2 + (1/2)**2) = 1.83772233983162 a = 1.83772233983162 - 3.58578643762691 = -1.74806409779529 b = 0.757359312880715 - 3.58578643762691 = -2.8284271247462 c = 1.83772233983162 - 3.58578643762691 = -1.74806409779529 x = a(c-b)(a-c-b)/(4(a+c-b)) = -1.74806409779529 * (-1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) * (-1.74806409779529 + -1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) /( 4 * (-1.74806409779529 + -1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) ) = -0.472135954999583
In reply to Re^4: OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.
by tilly
in thread OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |