I think you're conflating regular releases with frequent releases here. The latter are usually desirable (and give all the benefits you name in your post), while the former introduce some nasty side-effects and IMO are not a worthwhile goal. Smacks too much of five-year-plan mentality to me. I agree it's good to formulate a release plan and stick to it as much as possible, but a forced recurring release date just leads to unfixed bugs and inefficient organisation. Commercial companies have to do it because for some reason they are viewed as more professional if they can ship a piece of crap on time rather than a functioning app some time later. But free software doesn't have to care about that and shouldn't want to.
In reply to Re^3: what happened to regular releases
by tirwhan
in thread what happened to regular releases
by audiovolume
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |