That's not necessarily what I meant. If you'd have cut down your code to the essentials you would have removed the tempdir call before the loop and suddenly it would not have failed. You'd then at least have this extra bit of information which you could have checked up on yourself in the File::Temp code or added to the post. And it would have been easier for someone to look at the problem and figure out what the problem was without the irrelevant bits of information. As I said, just an aside for future reference, sorry if it maybe came across a little harsh.
In reply to Re^3: File::Temp randomness when forking
by tirwhan
in thread File::Temp randomness when forking
by ryantate
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |