My vote is with merlyn: security is not a language issue. It's not even just a application programming issue.Care to elaborate why security is not a language issue? 'Cause that sounds suspiciously like a C++ programmer claiming that memory management is not a language issue. Wouldn't most Perl programmers disagree with that notion? Why shouldn't we want our programming languages to help with security problems? Is there a better argument against this than "Well, you can't always predict what a program in a Turing complete language will do". Even if it can't solve all problems, wouldn't it be nice if it solved some (especially the most often occuring)? See also, the E Language.
In reply to Re^3: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)
by wazoox
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |