I did indeed know about the fact that Devel::Trace does not contain a license when I posted my response to Moron (see my reply two posts up err, one post lower)
everything else he has said in this subthread is aimed only at modules in a similar state of "no licence attached"
No, almost everything else is aimed at modules licensed under a FLOSS license. But I never mention that one needs to contact the author again (indeed I specifically denied that this needs to happen).
the general feel is that "You cannot use free software without the copyright owners permission--even if thay haven't added an explicit copyright notice"
No, correct would be "You cannot use a piece of software (writing, music, etc.) without the author's permission if they have not added an explicit license." If a piece of software is licensed under a FLOSS license, the author has already given you the permission to use it, it's in the license.
In reply to Re^21: Why non-core CPAN modules can't be used in large corporate environments.
by tirwhan
in thread Why non-core CPAN modules can't be used in large corporate environments.
by Moron
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |