They are struggling against a huge mainstream of standard SQL/RDBMS dogma they need to make their arguments easily accessible and not put the burden on the reader - that's fine for academia with it's well-stocked libraries but a bit much to expect of the casual reader who has not yet drunk their kool-aid.
FWIW, that's just what Database in Depth is designed to do. O'Reilly has posted a link to the first chapter, as well as an interview with Chris Date.
—Theory
In reply to Re^3: (OT) Why SQL Sucks (with a little Perl to fix it)
by Theory
in thread (OT) Why SQL Sucks (with a little Perl to fix it)
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |