It is that I am asked to do things with it that can't be expressed efficiently in a relational manner.
I think it would be interesting to have a better description of such tasks. At the very least some our SQL deficient readers will get an idea of things that dont work well in relational databases.
One such example that comes to mind is storing heirarchies. Relational semantics and directed acyclic graphs dont mix nicely. :-)
In reply to Re^2: (OT) Why SQL Sucks (with a little Perl to fix it)
by demerphq
in thread (OT) Why SQL Sucks (with a little Perl to fix it)
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |