I agree with you, do not misunderstand me! It all boils down to what you mean by "complicated". For example there may be a very concise way to do something that would also be fast, but may end up being unclear except possibly for very expert programmers and that the "simpler" solutions may all end up being... ehm... more complicated!
Indeed I was specifically asking about personal experiences with situations in which there were "really good reasons to make it complicated", because I don't recall any in my own experience, but others may well have! Just being curious, you know...
In reply to Re^2: Perl's own Duff's device?
by blazar
in thread Perl's own Duff's device?
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |