john_oshea's first suggestion really hits home.
As the developer, one "knows" what one builds into the package, but some of the features you include may be obscure to the various users he mentioned... whether because your descriptions -- as accurate as they may be -- don't "ring any bells" for some of them or whether your docs fail to spell out some feature or capability that's obvious to you but doesn't occur to them.And even if you can't find the writer he described, watching and coaching others thru the setup/use may greatly improve the documentation, as might the wiki approach, though I would fear that most contributions there would come from the more technically-inclined, leaving some end-user questions unanswered.
In reply to Re^2: creating documentation
by ww
in thread creating documentation
by stonecolddevin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |