Yes I am being clever.
Sometimes being clever and using bits and pieces of what the community has offered (ext 3 in this case) is what open source is all about- but then sometimes you *are* simply.. being clever for no good reason.
Isn't inode *the* way that ext3 and it's db trusts to keep up with what files are in the system? If it's good enough for my computer, shouldn't it be good enough for everything else ? This is why I thought maybe this was indeed the right way to go; because inode is the way that the machine keeps track of the files. And I kind of trust it more then me.
The environment is one of file-sharing with specific people. People who know little about machines (windows users) will be creating these files to share with even less computer savvy people (more windows users) - on a per person basis.
The people creating the files have power to- through the filesystem; rename the files! There has to be a way to keep track of the file. MD5 had some problems in 2004, some stuff about collisions .. dunno.. not my field.. but.. Is it still safe to check data on MD5 sum? - incredibly interesting suggestion!
In reply to Re^2: letting a browser client select a file to download by inode
by leocharre
in thread letting a browser client select a file to download by inode
by leocharre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |