Im having a little trouble digesting the tie documentation and seeing why I should use tie rather than dbmopen.A valid point. The dbmopen documentation ought to explain why it has been superceded by tie.
I don't claim to have a definitive answer. My hunch is that tie is much more flexible and Perl-ish function. So learning how to use it gives you a tool you can apply to many other types of situations.
But if dbmopen and its siblings are working for you, why change? I don't think a tie call is intended to be a drop-in replacement for a dbmopen call.
What do others think?
Jim Keenan
In reply to Re: trouble replacing dbmopen with tie
by jkeenan1
in thread trouble replacing dbmopen with tie
by tcf03
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |