I have two choices with which to implement passing data
to subroutines in packages and I was wondering whether
someone could enlighten as to which method is more
efficient.
The first method uses the standard method of passing
values to subroutines:
package Temp;
sub test
{
my ($params)=@_;
print "$params";
}
###main code
use Temp;
Temp->test("some param");
The other method uses perl oo to use the package's constructor
to store the variable values.
package Temp;
sub new
{
my ($class,$params)=@_;
my $self={};
$self->{param}="$params";
bless($self,$class);
return $self;
}
sub test
{
my ($self)=@_;
my $param=$self->{param};
print "$param";
}
###main code
use Temp;
my $obj=Send->new("some param");
$obj->test();
Aside from a syntaxical errors, both of these methods should
and do produce the same results. I'm wondering which is the
method of choice, especially if I start passing roughly 6
params to packaged subroutines.
Thanks.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.