So, I've been here for a while and I'm used to the site's quirks. I like quirks. 'Stumbit' is cute.
But I'm not crazy about the choices for Nodes to Consider; Right now they are
and after a while I've learned that if we're not being asked to delete (reap) something, we're being asked to approve an edit (add code tags, fix title, and so forth) or move a node. It would be a little less confusing, in particular for a node move (which requires a yes/no answer), if the choices were something like this:() keep () edit () reap () nada
either explicitly (as above) or implicitly (perhaps by updating the documentation). It just goes against the grain (briefly) when I have to approve a node move by clicking on 'edit'.() keep/no () edit/yes () reap () nada
Alex / talexb / Toronto
"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds
In reply to Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |