From my quick test, wsfp's (very excellent) code using HTML::TokeParser::Simple takes around 7 seconds to run the same test as my rather crude regex solution takes 2/10ths.
As you are processing your own, controlled data, you can choose either with a fair degree of safety. If you were processing html from another source where you didn't control the layout, the parser route would be preferable.
In reply to Re^4: Search function for guestbook history?
by BrowserUk
in thread Search function for guestbook history?
by JCHallgren
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |