I think your definitions are either overloaded, or perhaps even altogether broken. Simplicity and power are not mutually exclusive, yet you seem to be saying they are. I actually tend to find exactly the opposite -- the simplest things are very often the most powerful. (As a concrete example, consider a unix pipeline. Hooking the output from one program to the input from another is extremely simple, yet allows for amazingly powerful constructs.) I guess it might just be a matter of definitions, but I have to take issue with yours.
In reply to Re^2: OO in Perl 5: still inadequate
by Anonymous Monk
in thread OO in Perl 5: still inadequate
by Aristotle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |