'bare' is already assigned and it isn't a displaytype, so let's not overload that term.
Besides, 'bare' doesn't fit well. 'source' would be better. Or 'input' or 'asentered' or 'rawtext'...
Note that whether you get nodelets etc. around this would be separately controlled (by 'style=bare' or not).
- tye
In reply to Re^2: Perlmonks idea: Examine post code (view only) ('bare')
by tye
in thread Perlmonks idea: Examine post code (view only)
by tphyahoo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |