How is this different from module-authors@perl.org?
Its principal intended audience is much smaller: people who have taken over maintenance of CPAN modules from their original authors.
Not hosting it at perl.org will also give the perception that it's a second-class citizen list
At this point, I fully concede that it is a second-class citizen list -- because it hasn't proven itself. If people don't find it useful, its membership/readership will remain small and there will be no reason to host it at perl.org. If its readership grows, then transfer to a larger host would be worth considering.
I subscribe to several Perl lists which are not hosted at perl.org and, given their narrower focus, I think that's appropriate. There's More Than One Way to Host a Perl Mailing List.
Jim Keenan
In reply to Re^2: New mailing list for module-maintainers
by jkeenan1
in thread New mailing list for module-maintainers
by jkeenan1
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |