Am I crazy?
With modules named like that, surely! ;)
How would I go about making Pileofrogs::Frob transparently hand me Pileofrogs::Util::frob when I ask for Pileofrogs::Frob::frob?
Update: More efficient:package Pileofrogs::Frob; sub frob { warn("Redirecting Pileofrogs::Frob::frob to Pileofrogs::Util::frob\ +n") unless our $frob_warning++; require Pileofrogs::Util; &Pileofrogs::Util::frob }
package Pileofrogs::Frob; sub frob { warn("Redirecting Pileofrogs::Frob::frob to Pileofrogs::Util::frob\ +n"); require Pileofrogs::Util; { no warnings 'redefine'; *frob = \&Pileofrogs::Util::frob; } &frob }
Update: Switched from goto &frob; to &frob;. The latter is faster.
In reply to Re: Renaming a module
by ikegami
in thread Renaming a module
by pileofrogs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |