Ah. That is a lot more concrete than the idea I had in mind, though on reflection, it is the same principle.
This particular thing is something I’ve been doing instinctively – f.ex. one of the reasons to prefer dynamic, garbage-collected languages is that they tend to make this much easier, whereas in something like C, it’s generally a lot less work to pick arbitrary limits. But I hadn’t thought about it in such concrete terms, and I agree that the concreteness is useful.
Thanks for the explanation.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^4: On Quality (0,1,N)
by Aristotle
in thread On Quality
by Tanktalus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |