I have my own question: Is anyone else disappointed that Perl6 still seems to be more of a vague concept than reality? Perhaps this is not the case to those who are conceptually following its development, but I am more interested in using it.

I heard Larry Wall and Damien Conway talk on it at Yet Another Perl Conference 3 or 4 years ago. I don't know what I was thinking, but I was under the impression that it would be in my hands in no time. I thought that Perl 5 would be obsolete by now...

Is this just me?

"Never take yourself too seriously, because everyone knows that fat birds dont fly" -FLC

In reply to Re: What will the Perl 6 interpreter be written in? by scmason
in thread What will the Perl 6 interpreter be written in? by ghenry

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.