It would aid those that answer routine questions (under seekers of Perl wisdom) to point to other nodes that contain these definitions, in order that the novice could better understand their suggested codeYou mean like the manual or previous questions? You don't read those now
In reply to Re: A proposal: new section on Perl Monks.
by Anonymous Monk
in thread A proposal: new section on Perl Monks.
by Win
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |